Rear Window
#1
Posted 01 February 2010 - 07:48 PM
So I watched a bit of the real version and decided it was pretty cool, but I haven't finished it yet. He's a good director, this Alfred Hitchcock fellow. Thoughts, comments, reassuring descriptions of clouds?
#2
Posted 01 February 2010 - 07:57 PM
#3
Posted 01 February 2010 - 08:04 PM
#4
Posted 01 February 2010 - 08:04 PM
So yeah...uh.....was that the kind of comments you were gearing for?
#5
Posted 01 February 2010 - 08:09 PM
Absolutely. I'm a fan of The Birds and Psycho myself, but these three films are the only Hitchcock flicks I'm really familiar with.Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds and Psycho are cinematic masterpieces as was many of his other films including Rear Window. Now while I have not seen the latter all the way through, what I can say is this: it does not dissapoint. That Shia Lebeouf remake that came out a few years ago was absolute shit.
So yeah...uh.....was that the kind of comments you were gearing for?
#6
Posted 01 February 2010 - 08:15 PM
#7
Posted 02 February 2010 - 07:06 AM
you awaken in the intestinal tract of satan. you must defeat the hydra to escape. your only weapon is righteous anger.
#8
Posted 02 February 2010 - 09:51 AM
#9
Posted 02 February 2010 - 02:45 PM
#10
Posted 02 February 2010 - 06:04 PM
James Cameron, on teh other hand, is teh ownage.
#11
Posted 02 February 2010 - 06:38 PM
#12
Posted 02 February 2010 - 06:52 PM
a truer statement ive never heard.Look at me, I'm James Cameron. I make Avatar and Terminator and Titanic and I have lots of money hurr durr
but look at that right there, thats the example of adventure, action, and drama that youre going to use as the basis for your measurement of everything else youll ever see.
you awaken in the intestinal tract of satan. you must defeat the hydra to escape. your only weapon is righteous anger.
#13
Posted 03 February 2010 - 04:25 AM
#14
Posted 03 February 2010 - 08:46 AM
#15
Posted 03 February 2010 - 02:34 PM
Don't forget that Titanic is also based off a true story. Funny thing is he turned a comedic event into a drama.James Cameron is a bafoon who can't really direct a movie without tons of nature/physical/logical plot holes unless its a story based upon an all ready written and preconceived story as in the Terminator. Believe it or not, it was a short story long before it was a movie. That's why its easily, and by far, Cameron's best movie.
#16
Posted 03 February 2010 - 02:57 PM
Don't forget that Titanic is also based off a true story. Funny thing is he turned a comedic event into a drama.
Yeah, what the hell? Seriously.
#17
Posted 03 February 2010 - 03:23 PM
#18
Posted 03 February 2010 - 04:48 PM
Also, who cares why the movie was good, or that it costed approx. $240 million to make? Avatar was the shiznit.
#19
Posted 03 February 2010 - 05:11 PM
Too soon?
I was agreeing with you. Maybe the inflection didn't come across.
And Avatar? Really? The movie was awful. Half way through the movie, up untill the end, I was just, "wait...What? WHY?" Its......its pretty. That's about it. Story was old and stale, plot was rather boring, and for a movie about life and nature, it really didn't get the whole nature thing too well. I could point out all of the ecological, not to mention just plain logical, flaws with the movie, but at this time I wont, cause more than likely nobody cares.
#20
Posted 03 February 2010 - 07:35 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












